This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [just for the record]: new prologue analyzer for S/390
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:38:45 -0400
- Subject: Re: [just for the record]: new prologue analyzer for S/390
- References: <vt2r87zmpwm.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> <3EA41CE6.9000706@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:31:34PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >I think this patch shouldn't be committed; I'm just posting it for
> >reference.
> >
> >This patch implements a new prologue analyzer for the S/390. It's
> >meant to be general enough to handle the complex prologues GCC emits
> >on the S/390, and robust enough to tolerate compiler changes. In my
> >experience, it does pretty well, even on optimized code.
> >
> >However, the S/390 GDB folks at IBM and I agree that GDB on the S/390
> >should move towards using Dwarf 2 CFI and location lists whenever
> >possible, and do only minimal prologue analysis to handle those few
> >common cases where Dwarf 2 CFI is not available. And it looks to me
> >as if the work needed in GDB's core code to make it possible for any
> >target to use Dwarf 2 CFI is almost complete. In that light, it
> >doesn't make sense to dump a new, large, complex prologue analyzer
> >into the code base that will soon be eclipsed by a better solution.
> - the need to have gdb behave reasonably well when there is no, or
> minimal, debug info
The others aside for the moment, I believe this is the best reason to
continue to support the prologue analyzers.
On the other hand, we're making active progress in providing more and
better CFI; and now we support debug info in a separate file from the
code; so some day soon I expect that I won't even care how GDB behaves
without debug info except for debugging other people's proprietary
software to which I don't have source. And in that case (which comes
up occasionally) the level of sophistication needed from a prologue
analyzer is extremely low.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer