Re: patch to add QNX NTO i386 support

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>]

> BTW, Andrew, that HAVE_CONTINUABLE_WATCHPOINT patch....my current QNX patch
> which I'm about ready to submit, relies on it.  I know you're busy but can
> you tell me if it's at least mostly okay so that I can tell whether or not I
> need to change my backend before I submit.

See attached.

--- Begin Message ---

• From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
• To: Kris Warkentin <kewarken at qnx dot com>
• Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:53:38 -0500
• Subject: Re: [Patch] add HAVE_CONTINUABLE_WATCHPOINT to target ops
• Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:52:57 -0500
• Envelope-to: cagney@gnu.org
• References: <01ae01c2dc46$23e46fb0$0202040a@catdog>

2003-02-24 Kris Warkentin <kewarken at qnx dot com>

 * target.h: (HAVE_CONTINUABLE_WATCHPOINT): define.
 (target_ops): add to_have_continuable_watchpoint.
 * target.c (update_current_target): add INHERIT line for
 to_have_continuable_watchpoint.
 * infrun.c: remove HAVE_CONTINUABLE_WATCHPOINT defines
 * config/i386/nm-i386.h, config/i386/nm-i386sco5.h,
 config/i386/nm-i386sol2.h, config/s390/nm-linux.h,
 config/sparc/nm-sun4sol2.h: HAVE_CONTINUABLE_WATCHPOINT defined as 1.

You need to get the hang of change logs. Sentences that start with a capital and end with a fullstop.

Otherwize the patch is approved.

Andrew




--- End Message ---