Re: revamped gdb_mbuild.sh

[Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>]

> (Technical nit, -j 10 (or -j 2), right now doesn't work.  The sim 
> directory, well at least mn10300, has some missing dependencies :-()
> 

There you are, it's found one bug already :-) 

> > 
> > 
> > Yep, it would mean that in my case you could effectively run -c 1 -j 10 
> > and get fast builds with only the configures dropping down to single 
> > threaded (which would get most of the parallelism with the least transient 
> > disk space use) -- or have -c 2 -j 5 for a bit more configure parallelism 
> > with less make parallelism.  It would be a trade off that could be made by 
> > each user, and the load would be the product of the two.
> 
> M'kay (already appears to work).  How about `-b N' where `-b' stands for 
> ``build'' (configure, make, run, ...) for the option name.

Don't mind what they're called (provided they aren't 100 characters long 
:-)

R.