This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa+5.3] bug in my earlier DW_TAG_namespace patch


On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:33:09 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:

>> I've enclosed a patch below: for obvious reasons, it should go into
>> GDB 5.3 as well.  I've run GDB on a copy of GDB with this patch
>> applied and followed the control flow when GDB runs into various
>> sorts of DW_TAG_namespace entries, and the control flow seems to
>> behave like I expect it to.  (This is, admittedly, after only a
>> limited amount of testing.)  I'm in the middle of running the
>> testsuite (I'll run it twice, once on a compiler that doesn't
>> generate DW_TAG_namespace entries and once on a compiler that
>> does); assuming that there are no new regressions, is the patch
>> okay?

> Were there regressions?

Nope.

> If not, go ahead.

Thanks, will do.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]