This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: revised changes for gdb/mi 792


Have you guys tested the effect of this on Insight?

_If_ Insight variable and watch windows are still working after this change, then please check it in.

And thanks for the improvements.

Fernando


J. Johnston wrote:> Keith has pointed out some scenarios my original patch did not address and supplied
an alternate solution such that I have modified my patch. This replaces the former patch that was posted.

gdb/ChangeLog:

2002-10-15 Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>

* varobj.c (cplus_name_of_child): Change code to handle the fact that
fields are not necessarily contiguous with regards to their access control.
This is a fix for PR gdb/792.

Ok to commit?

-- Jeff J.


------------------------------------------------------------------------

--- varobj.0.c Fri Oct 11 15:46:03 2002
+++ varobj.c Tue Oct 15 17:00:14 2002
@@ -2176,7 +2176,6 @@
{
char *name;
struct type *type;
- int children[3];
if (CPLUS_FAKE_CHILD (parent))
{
@@ -2191,55 +2190,97 @@
{
case TYPE_CODE_STRUCT:
case TYPE_CODE_UNION:
- cplus_class_num_children (type, children);
-
if (CPLUS_FAKE_CHILD (parent))
{
- int i;
-
- /* Skip over vptr, if it exists. */
- if (TYPE_VPTR_BASETYPE (type) == type
- && index >= TYPE_VPTR_FIELDNO (type))
- index++;
-
- /* FIXME: This assumes that type orders
- inherited, public, private, protected */
- i = index + TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type);
- if (STREQ (parent->name, "private")
- || STREQ (parent->name, "protected"))
- i += children[v_public];
- if (STREQ (parent->name, "protected"))
- i += children[v_private];
+ /* The fields of the class type are ordered as they
+ appear in the class. We are given an index for a
+ particular access control type ("public","protected",
+ or "private"). We must skip over fields that don't
+ have the access control we are looking for to properly
+ find the indexed field. */
+ int type_index = TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type);
+ if (STREQ (parent->name, "private"))
+ {
+ while (index >= 0)
+ {
+ if (TYPE_VPTR_BASETYPE (type) == type
+ && type_index == TYPE_VPTR_FIELDNO (type))
+ ; /* ignore vptr */
+ else if (TYPE_FIELD_PRIVATE (type, type_index))
+ --index;
+ ++type_index;
+ }
+ --type_index;
+ }
+ else if (STREQ (parent->name, "protected"))
+ {
+ while (index >= 0)
+ {
+ if (TYPE_VPTR_BASETYPE (type) == type
+ && type_index == TYPE_VPTR_FIELDNO (type))
+ ; /* ignore vptr */
+ else if (TYPE_FIELD_PROTECTED (type, type_index))
+ --index;
+ ++type_index;
+ }
+ --type_index;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ while (index >= 0)
+ {
+ if (TYPE_VPTR_BASETYPE (type) == type
+ && type_index == TYPE_VPTR_FIELDNO (type))
+ ; /* ignore vptr */
+ else if (!TYPE_FIELD_PRIVATE (type, type_index) &&
+ !TYPE_FIELD_PROTECTED (type, type_index))
+ --index;
+ ++type_index;
+ }
+ --type_index;
+ }
- name = TYPE_FIELD_NAME (type, i);
+ name = TYPE_FIELD_NAME (type, type_index);
}
else if (index < TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type))
+ /* We are looking up the name of a base class */
name = TYPE_FIELD_NAME (type, index);
else
{
+ int children[3];
+ cplus_class_num_children(type, children);
+
/* Everything beyond the baseclasses can
- only be "public", "private", or "protected" */
+ only be "public", "private", or "protected"
+
+ The special "fake" children are always output by varobj in
+ this order. So if INDEX == 2, it MUST be "protected". */
index -= TYPE_N_BASECLASSES (type);
switch (index)
{
case 0:
- if (children[v_public] != 0)
- {
- name = "public";
- break;
- }
+ if (children[v_public] > 0)
+ name = "public";
+ else if (children[v_private] > 0)
+ name = "private";
+ else + name = "protected";
+ break;
case 1:
- if (children[v_private] != 0)
+ if (children[v_public] > 0)
{
- name = "private";
- break;
+ if (children[v_private] > 0)
+ name = "private";
+ else
+ name = "protected";
}
+ else if (children[v_private] > 0)
+ name = "protected";
+ break;
case 2:
- if (children[v_protected] != 0)
- {
- name = "protected";
- break;
- }
+ /* Must be protected */
+ name = "protected";
+ break;
default:
/* error! */
break;


--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]