This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] New bitflags type and eflags on i386/x86-64


On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:57:42PM +0200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >Well, actually, I like it. 
> 
> Wow! That's a surprise! :-)))
> 
> >Some textual changes and comments:
> 
> Thanks, I'm not a native speaker ;-)
> 
> >>+  builtin_type_i386_eflags = 
> >>+    init_flags_type (32 /* EFLAGS_LENGTH */, 
> >>+    	       "__i386_eflags", (struct objfile *) NULL);
> >>+  add_flag_name (builtin_type_i386_eflags, 0, "CF");
> >>+  builtin_type_simd_mxcsr =
> >>+    init_flags_type (32 /* EFLAGS_LENGTH */,
> >>+    	       "__simd_mxcsr", (struct objfile *) NULL);
> >>+  add_flag_name (builtin_type_simd_mxcsr, 0, "IE");
> > Do these really need to be in common code?  That's gross.  Yes, I know
> > a whole lot of others are, but those are all floatformats or standard
> > vectors.
> > This should be in i386-tdep.c.
> 
> I don't compile i386-tdep.c for x86-64. Should I duplicate the code for 
> x86-64 or better leave it here to have it only once?

Hmm, there's already some common files between the ports; there should
be another, I think.  I don't want something as i386-specific as this
anywhere near gdbtypes.c.  How about i386-common-tdep.c or something
like that?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]