This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Resend: [RFA] Fix problem with i386 watchpoints after restarting


At 18:25 04/07/2002 , Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit:
>On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> > At 15:35 17/06/2002 , Pierre Muller a écrit:
> > >At 12:16 13/06/2002 , Mark Kettenis a écrit:
> > > >Sorry, I somehow missed your earlier message.  This seems to me as an
> > > >acceptable way to solve the problem (although I still think there is
> > > >something wrong with GDB's mechanism of removing hardware breakpoints.
> > > >But: could you add the reason why this is needed to the comment.
> > > >Minor nit: Please end your sentences with a '.' and put two spaces
> > > >after it.
> > >OK, I slightly modifed the patch
> > >by adding a comment to i386-nat.c 
> > >and correcting the comment in the nm-i386.h file.
> > >
> > >Can I check this in?
> > 
> > After getting approval by a private mail, I have
> > checked this in.
>
>Is this appropriate for the branch also?  My instincts say yes.
Isn't 5.2.1 aleady frozen?

I would also be in favor of putting it into the branch, but I don't know who should decide this....


Pierre Muller
Institut Charles Sadron
6,rue Boussingault
F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France)
mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07  Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]