Re: RFA: document macro support

[Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>]

Jim Blandy wrote:-

> > Is there any progress on using libcpp, or is that on the back burner?
> 
> Well, first libcpp needs to be disentangled from GCC.  Right now it
> shares its configury and build files with GCC, and lives in the `gcc'
> directory.  All of this makes it rather difficult to share libcpp
> between the gcc and sourceware repositories.  Zack W. has volunteered
> to disintegrate libcpp, but apparently the 3.2 release process hinders
> this.
> 
> I'll be posting GDB tests for the macro support in the next few days.
> They will include tests for the bugs you pointed out in my macro
> expander, so the issues with token marking won't be forgotten.

OK, great.  IIRC Zack indicated he might be able to move CPP before
3.2, but let's see.  I have no idea if he has time.

Neil.