This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/RFC] MI: accept (void) as well as ().
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>, msnyder at redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, msnyder at cygnus dot com
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 23:11:15 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] MI: accept (void) as well as ().
- References: <200205090258.g492wgF17617@duracef.shout.net>
> Yes, all my dwarf-2 configurations show type="void (*)(void)", and all my
> stabs+ configurations show type="void (*)()". This is true for both
> gcc v2 and gcc v3 compilers.
>
> You can see the characteristic patterns in the attention table:
>
> http://www.shout.net/pub/mec/sunday/2002-05-05/Attention-gdb-HEAD.html
[broken link?]
> All five dwarf-2 configurations FAIL on these tests, and all five stabs+
> configurations PASS.
Ok, good. Yes, definitly ok then.
It isn't the job of the MI testsuite to test for STABS vs DWARF2 problems.
> There is duplicated code in gdb.mi/mi0-var-child.exp if someone wants
> to hit that too.
Don't worry.
Andrew