This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Fwd: Re: GDB 5.2 vs. Ada (and probably other unknown languages)]


> * language.c (unk_lang_create_fundamental_type):  Remove.
>     (unknown_language_defn, auto_language_defn, local_language_defn):
>     In place of unk_lang_create_fundamental_type use
>     c_create_fundamental_type.
> 
> So should I go ahead and check this in?

This is really a question for the language maintainers (hmm, you're a 
language maintainer :-).  I believe this was Ok by DanielJ who this also 
affected so I guess it is.

(I posted a note earlier trying to encourage the language maintainers to 
self organize and perform a minor coup).

Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]