This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Your patch to list.exp
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: fnf at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 20:11:08 -0500
- Subject: Your patch to list.exp
I just saw this on gdb-cvs. Was it ever on gdb-patches? I don't recall
seeing it at least.
Is it actually correct if you have debugging information for _start
available? If we connect and are in a known line, presumably we will list
there instead.
revision 1.5
date: 2002/03/26 00:36:07; author: fnf; state: Exp; lines: +2 -7
2002-03-25 Fred Fish <fnf@redhat.com>
* gdb.base/list.exp: This test works on remote targets so remove
the short circuit for remote targets. Update copyright.
----------------------------
revision 1.4
date: 2002/02/14 06:25:18; author: drow; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
2002-02-14 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* gdb.base/a2-run.exp: Check for a remote target properly.
* gdb.base/annota1.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.base/list.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.base/reread.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.base/scope.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.base/shlib-call.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.base/term.exp: Likewise.
* gdb.c++/annota2.exp: Likewise.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer