This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Select a particular mangling of a demangled symbol in lookup_block_symbol


dj>	A::A(int) [not-in-charge]

Can the input parser handle that syntax?  Suppose the user wants to
disassemble the not-in-charge constructor?

That's why I want to stick the information in the name:

  A::A(int)
  A::A$nic(int)

dj> Meanwhile, I'd like to put this patch in because it is a strict
dj> improvement over what we have.

I'll look at this particular patch so that I can offer an opinion.

Michael C


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]