This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[RFA] Remove some obsolete gcc xfails from overload.exp
- From: Fred Fish <fnf at fred dot ninemoons dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: fnf at redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:08:51 -0700 (MST)
- Subject: [RFA] Remove some obsolete gcc xfails from overload.exp
- Reply-to: fnf at redhat dot com
Some of the gcc xfails in overload.exp seem to be obsolete. The
xfailed tests currently pass with the development gdb using the latest
development gcc, and also with the released gdb-5.1.0.1 using the
released gcc-3.0.3.
2002-01-07 Fred Fish <fnf@redhat.com>
* gdb.c++/overload.exp: Remove unconditional xfails for:
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)
print foo_instance1.overload1arg()
print foo_instance1.overload1arg((char)arg2)
print foo_instance1.overload1arg((signed char)arg3)
print foo_instance1.overload1arg((unsigned char)arg4)
print foo_instance1.overload1arg((int)arg7)
print foo_instance1.overload1arg((unsigned int)arg8)
print foo_instance1.overload1arg((float)arg11)
print foo_instance1.overload1arg((double)arg12)
Index: gdb.c++/overload.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/overload.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -c -p -r1.6 overload.exp
*** overload.exp 2001/11/01 23:41:09 1.6
--- overload.exp 2002/01/07 21:09:15
***************
*** 1,4 ****
! # Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
--- 1,4 ----
! # Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 110,121 ****
}
- # The overload resolver added by HP (valops.c:find_overload_match) doesn't
- # work right for G++ output, since the list of parameters seems not to
- # be filled in correctly. Until this gets fixed, don't expect to pass
- # these tests.
-
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 1\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 110,115 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 126,133 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 2\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 120,125 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 138,145 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 3\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 130,135 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 150,157 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 4\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 140,145 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 162,169 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 5\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 150,155 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 174,181 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 6\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 160,165 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 186,193 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 7\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 170,175 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 198,205 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 8\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 180,185 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 210,217 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 9\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 190,195 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 222,229 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 10\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 200,205 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 234,241 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overloadargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 11\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 210,215 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 246,253 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overload1arg()\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 1\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 220,225 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 258,265 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overload1arg((char)arg2)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 2\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 230,235 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 270,277 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overload1arg((signed char)arg3)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 3\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 240,245 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 282,289 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overload1arg((unsigned char)arg4)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 4\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 250,255 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 294,299 ****
--- 260,270 ----
}
+ # The overload resolver added by HP (valops.c:find_overload_match) doesn't
+ # work right for G++ output, since the list of parameters seems not to
+ # be filled in correctly. Until this gets fixed, don't expect to pass
+ # some of these tests.
+
setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overload1arg((short)arg5)\n"
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 318,325 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overload1arg((int)arg7)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 7\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 289,294 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 330,337 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overload1arg((unsigned int)arg8)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 8\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 299,304 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 366,373 ****
}
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
-
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overload1arg((float)arg11)\n"
gdb_expect {
-re ".\[0-9\]* = 11\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
--- 333,338 ----
*************** gdb_expect {
*** 377,384 ****
timeout { fail "(timeout) print call overloaded func float arg" }
}
-
- setup_xfail "*-*-*" CLLbs16901
send_gdb "print foo_instance1.overload1arg((double)arg12)\n"
gdb_expect {
--- 342,347 ----