Re: [RFA] Don't use thread_db on corefiles

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 02:55:31PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:21:48PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patch fixes a really frustrating internal error when you open the
> > > > coredump of a multithreaded application.  Depending on your kernel, either
> > > > the core has threads (corefile.c supports this just fine) or it doesn't.
> > > > Neither way will opening libthread_db work right.
> > >
> > > Daniel, what exactly is the problem that you are solving?
> > > What do you mean by "work right"?
> > 
> > Work at all.  Witness:
> 
> What the heck kind of core file is this?  I've never seen
> the behavior you're getting.  GDB certainly works for standard
> corefiles on Linux (which BTW don't have any thread info in them).

This is a multithreaded core file :)

It follows the basic ELF standard for multiple threads in one core
file; multiple PRSTATUS notes, the first of which is the thread that
crashed.

I'm still putting some touches on the kernel patch itself.  Stopping
multiple threads so you can dump them is a royal pain.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer