This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Fix stack backtraces on 26-bit ARM
- To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Subject: Re: Fix stack backtraces on 26-bit ARM
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 18:21:38 -0400
- Cc: Ben Harris <bjh21 at netbsd dot org>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, Jim blandy <jimb at cygnus dot com>, Todd Vierling <tv at wasabisystems dot com>
- References: <200110221104.MAA06894@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
>> Hmm, I have the bones of a completely clean NetBSD/arm port. It isn't
>> complete, but it was written without reference to the existing NetBSD code.
>>
>
>
> Ok, attached is most of the code. There's one more patch, which I'll send
> separately, that allows ARM targets to be single-stepped when there is no
> kernel/hw support for single stepping.
>
> R.
>
> <date> Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
>
> * config/arm/nbsd.mh config/arm/nbsd.mt config/arm/tm-nbsd.h
> config/arm/nm-nbsd.h config/arm/xm-nbsd.h: New files.
> * armbsd-nat.c: New file.
> * Makefile.in: Build it.
> * configure.host configure.tgt: Support NetBSD/arm.
(There has been some out of band assignment e-mail which has left me
pretty confused :-)
Lets see.
RichardE, the above was developed while you were at ARM and is hence
covered, solely, by an ARM assignment? [yes | no]
If this is true, can I suggest to the Arm maintainers that this be
considered. Then BenH can apply fixes to it (always easier and less
likely to have assignment problems) then new code. (I understand, third
hand this is kind of BenH's plan already).
I think this is preferable as it gives GDB's NetBSD/ARM support a clear
and auditable paper trail.
enjoy,
Andrew