This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [rfa] Fix DOS clash with mi0-var-*.exp


> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:23:31 -0400
>> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
>> 
>> The attatched patch addresses a DOS file name clash caused by all the 
>> mi0-var-*.exp files I recently created.
>> 
>> Is this the correct way to do this?  The files aren't used in a DOS build.
> 
> 
> Yes, this is the way.  However:
> 
> 
>> + @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-var-cmd.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-varcmd.exp
>> + @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-var-child.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-varchild.exp
> 
> 
> These two still clash: truncation to 8+3 yields "mi0-varc.exp" for
> both of them.


Will fix.

Hmm, that would mean that mi-var-cmd.exp and mi-var-child.exp also 
clash.  Ah, yes found them hidden in fnchange.lst, would you object to 
me (separatly) sorting that file?


> Actually, I wonder why do we have to keep those mi0- prefixes.  This
> is all in gdb.mi subdirectory, so there should be no need to stress
> the fact we are talking about mi.  If the zero is significant, we can
> keep it, but "mi" can go, I think.


If my memory is correct, it is a namespace proof things.  While it looks 
like a two level structure dejagnu ignores this and just worries about 
the basename.  If I tell dejagnu to run the test ``var-cmd.exp'' I get 
all of them.

	Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]