Re: [RFA] Fix uninitialized section index internal error

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>]

Actually, there have been a few more exchanges on this patch. (there
were 2 submissions). See other discussion, which also needs to be
resolved. Will do now.

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-06/msg00284.html

Elena


Andrew Cagney writes:
 > Just FYI, I'm cleaning out my MBOX.  I'm going to assume this patch is 
 > dead.  If my memory is correct the symtab people are trying to eliminate 
 > knwledge about magic ``.bss'' sections, not clone it :-)
 > 
 > 	Andrew
 > 
 > > Index: gdb/symfile.c
 > > ===================================================================
 > > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symfile.c,v
 > > retrieving revision 1.31
 > > diff -c -3 -p -r1.31 symfile.c
 > > *** symfile.c	2001/04/05 02:02:13	1.31
 > > --- symfile.c	2001/05/10 19:41:39
 > > *************** default_symfile_offsets (struct objfile 
 > > *** 529,534 ****
 > > --- 529,536 ----
 > >       objfile->sect_index_data = sect->index;
 > >   
 > >     sect = bfd_get_section_by_name (objfile->obfd, ".bss");
 > > +   if (!sect)
 > > +     sect = bfd_get_section_by_name (objfile->obfd, ".sbss");
 > >     if (sect) 
 > >       objfile->sect_index_bss = sect->index;
 > >   
 > > 
 > 
 >