This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] if (INNER_THAN (read_sp(), step_sp - 16))
- To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFC] if (INNER_THAN (read_sp(), step_sp - 16))
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:07:24 -0400
- Cc: "Peter.Schauer" <Peter dot Schauer at Regent dot E-Technik dot TU-Muenchen dot DE>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <3B2A97C7.52A839FD@cygnus.com> <3B2A9EC8.7020106@cygnus.com> <3B2AB1E7.C32AA591@cygnus.com>
> Well it can't be a (ugh) #ifdef :-)
>
>
> Not even to temporarily circumvent a known bug?
Not even to tempoarily circumvent a known bug.
> I understand your objection (multi-arch, if not general
> distaste), but there are lots of ifdefs in infrun.c already...
>
> FYI, I was thinking along the lines of
> (currently_stepping (ecs)
> #ifdef TM_i386SOL2_H
> && !(step_range_end
> && INNER_THAN (read_sp (), (step_sp - 16)))
> #endif
> ));
>
> which would preserve the behavior on x86 solaris, while
> protecting the rest of the world until Peter can come up
> with a better implementation.
I honestly think it would be better to revert PeterS's N year old change
and file a PR.
Andrew