This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
- To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
- From: Keith Seitz <keiths at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:08:31 -0800 (PST)
- cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at cygnus dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
> Fernando Nasser wrote:
> >
> > Sounds reasonable. Check it in (assuming you have already added yourself to the write after approval list).
>
> Hold on -- aren't you defeating the purpose of this test?
> The test was added by HP precisely because these calls
> fail when malloc isn't included in the target program.
> The test is a duplicate of callfuncs.exp, except that it
> doesn't link malloc.
So the purpose of the test is to FAIL? What's the passing criteria?
Keith