Re: patch: regression: C++ overload

[dan at cgsoftware dot com (Daniel Berlin+list.gdb-patches)]

Jimmy Guo <guo@cup.hp.com> writes:


> >There weren't any regressions caused by the problem, you just get 2
> >less unexpected passes, so i didn't notice any problems.
> 
> I should have caught that when I merged HP WDB's source up to 3/21's
> yesterday.
> 
> Actually the testing caught this when I ran the tests at our HP aCC
> pass, for which we are used to PASSs, but got XFAs for these test points
> with odd number of arguments (and then appeared on and off at repeated
> print commands, which points to some sort of UMR problem).

I can't run those tests yet, i haven't figured out how to convince it
to let me, or they aren't the tests you are talking about.
I'm adding some testsuite tests to gdb.c++/overload.exp for multiarg
overloads.
I had a feeling something was wrong when i could do stuff on beos i
couldn't do on FreeBSD, but like i said, i hadn't had time to
investigate.

I'm looking at the RTTI patch you sent me.


> 
> - Jimmy