This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] TODO more cleanups
- To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: [patch] TODO more cleanups
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at delorie dot com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:35:12 -0500 (EST)
- CC: gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <3A1882DA.5BB83CCF@cygnus.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:48:10 +1100
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
>
> To expand a little on the comment attatched to STREQ(). The intention
> is that the person rewriting the STREQ() calls does more than hope that
> the changes work.
Can you tell why this is at all a Good Thing?
I've seen projects that argue whether or not to replace strcmp with
STREQ, but this is the first project that wants to do the opposite...