This is the mail archive of the gas2@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the gas2 project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
From: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 1998 07:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Has anyone looked at ELF 4.1? It is at http://www.sco.com/products/layered/develop/devspecs/ It is quite interesting. It has something we have talked about a few month back. I assume you are referring to EI_OSABI and EI_ABIVERSION. (Or do you mean something else? Why must you be so cryptic?) As I read it, it's a bit different from the OLF proposal. SCO is defining EI_OSABI as indicating whether the file conforms to the standard ELF format. A value of 0 (ELFOSABI_SYSV) indicates that the file does conform. For EI_ABIVERSION, a conforming application must use 0. Our files do conform to the specification (I hope), so it is correct for us to use 0 for both. However, we could perhaps ask registry@sco.com to define ELFOSABI_LINUX, and define that as being the same as the standard, but using the Linux API. Similarly for other free operating systems. Ian