Re: Doing a vendor branch import and merge if libunwind

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>]

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 16:26 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>   
> > > If we have a good workflow we should update the webpages.
> > > Thanks to Tim for helping me out when I got stuck on irc.
> > >   
> > >       
> > Please don't hold back here; this is clearly far better than what we 
> > have now; so should replace what we have now
> >     
>
> Yeah, you are right. I was just holding back since I am not sure this is
> really the best workflow. But it does seem to work. So I cleaned up the
> working a bit and added it to the end of htdocs/build/git-fu.html.
>
>   
Thanks.
> Please update and expand if you know a better way to do it.
>
> The thing you don't record now in git is the 'extra fixes needed for
> this new import' step. I am not sure you can actually do that nicely,
> because if you commit immediately after the merge to trunk, but before
> you fix things up to resolve either conflicts or new stuff needed to
> compiler/run correctly you are left with a commit that won't
> compiler/run the tests correctly, which is bad if someone really wants
> to use bisect for example.
>
>   
Nurdin handled this by doing the merge onto a branch cut from mainline.  
Once all was resolved he merged that.

> I pushed the git-fu.html change, but that did give me an error (I assume
> from the server): "/git/frysk.git/hooks/update-htdocs: line 21:
> git-archive: command not found"
> And http://sourceware.org/frysk/build/git-fu.html hasn't been updated
> with the new changes.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>