Re: dwarflint vs C++

[Petr Machata <pmachata at redhat dot com>]

Roland McGrath wrote:
> Also, still getting a lot of:
> 
> error: .debug_aranges: addresses 0x412fe9..0x412fe9 of section .text are not covered.
> 
> Is that saying a 0-byte range or a 1-byte range?  Perhaps use [x,y] or
> [x,y) notation for all byte/addr ranges to be more clear.  If it's a 1-byte
> range, it should not be complaining because .text has sh_addralign=16, so
> [0x412fe9,0x412ff0) is expected alignment padding.

That should be 1-byte range.  I've introduced the [,) notation, it's on 
the branch.  The alignment is now also considered.

PM

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature