This is the mail archive of the elfutils-devel@sourceware.org mailing list for the elfutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com> writes: > And this is the problem. Sorry. I should have realized earlier. > We use the .debug_aranges to get a quick index of the CUs and which > address ranges they cover. In the case that there is no .debug_aranges > we could do a full scan of all CUs. But that is somewhat inefficient, > since no .debug_aranges could also mean that there really are no > CUs with address scope DIEs (however that is probably unlikely). But > if there is a .debug_aranges then we do assume it is complete. I am > thinking whether we should still scan all CUs anyway if we are > looking for an address that is really inside a module. But I think > that would quickly become very inefficient. > Does elfutils need .debug_ranges as well? Cheers, - Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |