This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Boolean typedefs

From: Alan Bowman <alan dot michael dot bowman at gmail dot com>
To: ecos-patches at ecos dot sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 20:47:50 +0100
Subject: Boolean typedefs

A few weeks ago, I posted a query about booleans on the ecos-discuss
list (http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2010-04/msg00035.html).
 There were no comments either way,  so here's a patch.  It should
mean that all booleans end up using GCC's _Bool type, instead of a mix
of _Bool and int.  It showed up a couple of places where a function
prototype didn't match the implementation, and this patch fixes them.

Do others think that there was a problem with boolean definitions, and
is this an appropriate fix?

Alan Bowman

Attachment: bool_patch_hg
Description: Binary data

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boolean typedefs
  - From: Jonathan Larmour

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]