This is the mail archive of the
ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: [ECOS] Re: eCosCentric copyright hold in headers
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
- To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- Cc: Alex Schuilenburg <alexs at ecoscentric dot com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>,eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:21:45 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: eCosCentric copyright hold in headers
- References: <20040408101602.GJ29940@lunn.ch> <4075305D.8020101@eCosCentric.com> <20040408111939.GK29940@lunn.ch> <407556D4.8080407@ecoscentric.com> <40755B58.30905@eCosCentric.com>
Should we propose what the new banner looks like?
Is the basic format of the current banner OK?
--- ChangeLog 2004-04-08 16:12:54.000000000 +0200
+++ ChangeLog.new 2004-04-08 16:17:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
// -------------------------------------------
// This file is part of eCos, the Embedded Configurable Operating System.
// Copyright (C) 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 Red Hat, Inc.
+// Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
//
// eCos is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
// the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
@@ -26,9 +27,6 @@
//
// This exception does not invalidate any other reasons why a work based on
// this file might be covered by the GNU General Public License.
-//
-// Alternative licenses for eCos may be arranged by contacting Red Hat, Inc.
-// at http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/ecos-license/
// -------------------------------------------
//####ECOSGPLCOPYRIGHTEND####
//===========================================================================
The last bit clearly wants to go since its not been true for a long
while.
Should the original RedHat Copyright line be deleted as well? I guess
leaving it could confuse people into thinking the files are still
copyright RedHat as well as being FSF..
Andrew