This is the mail archive of the
ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: [ECOS] How to build redboot/ecos?
- From: Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc dot com>
- To: Alex Schuilenburg <alexs at ecoscentric dot com>
- Cc: eCos Maintainers <ecos-maintainers at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: 22 Sep 2003 10:29:26 -0600
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] How to build redboot/ecos?
- Organization: MLB Associates
- References: <A4E787A2467EF849B00585F14C900559068B13@18.172.in-addr.arpa> <1063752622.5547.472.camel@hermes> <3F6F1B9D.2020000@ecoscentric.com> <1064246821.1015.283.camel@hermes> <3F6F2048.9070906@ecoscentric.com>
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 10:16, Alex Schuilenburg wrote:
> Gary Thomas wrote:
> ...
> >>>Really? Where? The only official source for eCos is:
> >>> http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/
> >>
> >>It is?
> >>
> >>I thought we were moving away from the RedHat based URL to the vendor
> >>neutral http://ecos.sourceware.org/
> >
> >
> > Fair enough, but it surely isn't on sourceforge AFAIK.
>
> Source*ware*, not sourceforge.
>
> ecos.sourceware.org is simply an alias for s.r.c. and s.r.c. has been
> set up to provide virtual hosting. Hence it is the same machine, just
> not advertised as such. The gcc group use the same trick for gcc.gnu.org
>
> I suspect the announcement may have been be delayed until eCos falls
> under the FSF umbrella so that ecos becomes also available as
> http://ecos.gnu.org. The prefferred "official" URL,
> ecos.gnu.org or ecos.sourceware.org, is up to you maintainers to decide :-)
>
Understood. I was just seeing if this guy actually got something from
sourceforge (some clandestine project?) or was just confused.
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates