This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Switching to using git on eCosForge

From: Ãyvind Harboe <oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com>
To: Alex Schuilenburg <alexs at ecoscentric dot com>
Cc: eCos Disuss <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:10:11 +0200
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Switching to using git on eCosForge
References: <c09652430909170352h4e907a1ch91a8156eef4b7061@mail.gmail.com> <4AB22E5F.8090807@ecoscentric.com> <c09652430909170556p5bd4f2e4g32aca9a4dc713ea9@mail.gmail.com> <4AB23FD3.2020808@ecoscentric.com>

> The same could be said of any of the three :-)

My situation is that I have no choice but to learn git.
Linux forced me to. eCos could force me to learn
about mercurial as well. I'm try to be economic
with the # of tools that I teach myself.

> However, for distributed development, not using proper DRSC tools, whichever
> you choose, is foolhardy IMHO.

DRSC?

> I dont think you can say mercurial (or hg for short) is better for closed
> source.

I meant to say that I found mercurial nicer & friendlier at first
glance, so if I didn't have to interact w/open source *at all*,
then mercurial looked more attractive to me. As the
case was, I was forced to learn git first.


-- 
Ãyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://www.zylin.com

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- Switching to using git on eCosForge
  - From: Ãyvind Harboe
- Re: Switching to using git on eCosForge
  - From: Alex Schuilenburg
- Re: Switching to using git on eCosForge
  - From: Ãyvind Harboe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]