This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: RedBoot banner
- From: "Chris Zimman" <czimman at bloomberg dot com>
- To: "Jonathan Larmour" <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>, "Sergei Gavrikov" <sg at belvok dot com>
- Cc: "eCos discuss list" <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:06:19 -0500
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] RedBoot banner
- References: <20090202110036.GA32548@sg-ubuntu.local> <4988305C.8090609@eCosCentric.com>
> > RedBoot(tm) bootstrap and debug environment [ROM]
> > Non-certified release, version UNKNOWN - built 12:06:17, Feb 2 2009
> > Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > RedBoot is free software, covered by the eCos license, derived from
> > the GNU General Public License. You are welcome to change it and/or
> > distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Under the license
> > RedBoot's source code and full license terms must have been made
> > you.
> > Redboot comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
> > Platform: Olimex LPC-H2294 header board (ARM7TDMI-S)
> > RAM: 0x81000000-0x81100000, [0x81005900-0x810e1000] available
> > FLASH: 0x80000000-0x803fffff, 8 x 0x2000 blocks, 63 x 0x10000 blocks
> > RedBoot>
> > What do you think? Thank you,
> That seems reasonable, but I'd appreciate wider input first on whether
> that's the best order before changing it.
I'd rather not see license related info as part of a startup banner.
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss