This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Looking in a future: VCS for eCos 3.0
- From: Dave Lawrence <dlawrence at ad-holdings dot co dot uk>
- To: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:27:37 +0100
- Subject: [ECOS] Re: Looking in a future: VCS for eCos 3.0
- References: <20080827145131.GA12261@ubuntu.local> <48B7FFC9.7040605@eCosCentric.com> <20080829160552.GA23722@ubuntu.local> <ace3f33d0808291709j4bbf18f6l9a42e3e8d24bcfd6@mail.gmail.com> <270dc33e0809010213g5bb73581h4e2b1db26adb7fb6@mail.gmail.com> <20080901165527.GA7801@ubuntu.local>
[snip]
>> SVN is stable, fast, secure, works without problems through routers,
>> directory structures are handled more efficiently than with CVS, file
>
> I've not seen a compliment "stable" for any VCS. Most of them are marked
> either "active developed" or "maintained but" in Wikipedia comparison:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software
I don't think "actively developed" can be read to mean "unstable".
We've been using SVN for 3 years and in my experience it is very stable.
If you do decide to stay with the client-server model I would definately
reccommend SVN.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss