This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: [Fwd: AT91SAM7S : cyg_io_write /dev/ser0]
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
- To: jc dot caquet at kerlink dot fr
- Cc: 'eCos discussion' <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:01:30 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] [Fwd: AT91SAM7S : cyg_io_write /dev/ser0]
- References: <20070906180230.GL31456@lunn.ch> <E1ITaXI-0005og-00@londo.lunn.ch>
> OK, when doing so I get the following result when building ecos library :
>
> packages/devs/serial/arm/at91/current/src/at91_serial.c:506: structure has
> no member named `data_xmt_req'
> packages/devs/serial/arm/at91/current/src/at91_serial.c: In function
> `at91_serial_DSR':
> packages/devs/serial/arm/at91/current/src/at91_serial.c:613: structure has
> no member named `data_rcv_req'
> /packages/devs/serial/arm/at91/current/src/at91_serial.c:624: structure has
> no member named `data_rcv_done'
> packages/devs/serial/arm/at91/current/src/at91_serial.c:647: structure has
> no member named `data_xmt_done'
> packages/devs/serial/arm/at91/current/src/at91_serial.c:652: structure has
> no member named `data_xmt_req'
>
> When CYGINT_IO_SERIAL_BLOCK_TRANSFER is not defined "_data_rcv_req,
> _data_rcv_done, _data_xmt_req, _data_xmt_done" are excluded from structure
> definition in serial.h.
> Do you think that some #if defined CYGINT_IO_SERIAL_BLOCK_TRANSFER are
> missing in at91_serial.c ?
It looks like it :-(
This is something to fix later.
I guess you will have to single step through the code and work out
what is happening....
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss