This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Re: Wrong declaration of idle_thread_stack

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
To: Uwe Kindler <ukindler at htwm dot de>
Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com,Eric de Jong <list_ericdejong_10 at gmx dot net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:16:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: Wrong declaration of idle_thread_stack
References: <002701c3e030$81cec690$2c79378d@uwepc> <20040121182548.GB3270@lunn.ch> <000e01c3e053$243fbc50$2c79378d@uwepc> <000301c3e0bc$86747b40$e33922c7@ericnt> <001801c3e0c2$772cae40$2c79378d@uwepc>

> But this does not solve the eCos idle_thread_stack problem because it is
> inside the kernel and this should be a kernel patch. Also th?s would be
> necessary for other char arrays within the eCos source that should be
> aligned.
> 
> Regards, Uwe

Exactly. This is a compiler issue. Have a look at the flags you can
pass to the compiler. You may be able to tell it to change its default
behavior. 

You might want to post to one of the gcc lists.

       Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- Re: Wrong declaration of idle_thread_stack
  - From: Uwe Kindler
- Re: Re: Wrong declaration of idle_thread_stack
  - From: Eric de Jong
- Re: Re: Wrong declaration of idle_thread_stack
  - From: Uwe Kindler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]