This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Footprint size.

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
To: James Yates <j dot yates at quartzuk dot com>
Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 16:33:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Footprint size.
References: <CB39E7B8FC98924D85DFBED207E4CC9831F8CD@ip02.quartzelec.adsl.gxn.net>

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:23:46PM +0100, James Yates wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what they think should be the approximate footprint size of a basic eCos kernel built on an SH or i386 platform. I am in the process of porting to a new SH2 processor and target platform, but when I build my eCos library libtarget.a comes out at 2924kB. This sounds excessively large to me but I am new to eCos so have no idea of what it should be.
> 
>    Can anyone help?



A good place to start is ---------|
                                  |
                                \ | /
                                 \|/
                                  
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
 
This is a FAQ thats been asked too many times.

     Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- Footprint size.
  - From: James Yates

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]