This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: EB40/AT91 and EB40A Patches
- From: "Christophe Part" <part at silicomp dot qc dot ca>
- To: <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Tim Drury" <tdrury at siliconmotorsports dot com>,<greghol at sbcglobal dot net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:40:53 -0400
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] EB40/AT91 and EB40A Patches
Hi Tim,
Just to be sure I have done the right thing ...
I have applied Thomas Koeller patch
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-patches/2002-06/msg00016.html
( Do not forget the patch for the ecos.db)
then I have applied Tim Drury patch
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-patches/2002-07/msg00036.html
1) AT49xxxx flash patch
2) EB40A target patch
3) ecos.db patch
I have found var_io.h and plf_io.h files from Marc Pignat.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2002-07/msg00371.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2002-07/msg00376.html
I have applied the patch for the eb40a from Tim just before, so I have
patched var_io.h by hand.
I had to change the line #include <cyg/hal/plf_io.h> for #include
<cyg/hal/var_io.h> in tree files to compile the redboot for the eb40 and
eb40a.
They are :
- var/current/src/hal_dial.c
- var/current/src/at91_misc.c
- eb40/current/src/eb40_misc.c
Is it correct ?
I cannot test my load because I have just an at91eb55.
I hope this help someone else.
Christophe
----------------------------------------------
> Greg Holdren wrote:
> Tim,
>
> I have installed the tar files and both Thomas's and your ecos.db patch
> files.
> Your at91_patch fie is quite large so Im trying to let patch do this one.
In
> any
> case I seem to be missing the file, "var_io.h", in
> "hal/arm/at91/var/current/include", so
> its bombing on this part of it. Could I get yours? Should have at91.tar
> provide this?
> TNX
> Greg Holdren
----------------------------------------------
> Tim Drury wrote:
> Greg, you will probably only run into this problem when patching ecos.db
> since that file is constantly getting patched. Ecos.db is arranged as
> many small blocks of ~8 lines and it is very easy to merge changes by
> hand. It should be a fairly easy exercise to install the patches
> manually be changing/inserting the new blocks that pertain to the at91,
> eb40, eb40a, and eb40a flash driver.
> The bulk of the patches work on the hal/arm/at91 directory structure
> which, IIRC, Thomas' patch completely re-writes. Then my patch patches
> his patch :)
> Hopefully we'll be seeing all these at91 patches worked back into cvs
> soon.
> -tim
----------------------------------------------
> Greg Holdren wrote:
> Im trying to apply the patches to split the AT91 and EB40 sources out
> and Im
> running into errors in the process.
> Im using a 10-14-02 snapshot of the CVS. I tried to apply Thomas's
> patch to
> the ecos.db file with out errors.
>
> This is what Im doing: patch -p0 < this is in
> ...packages/hal
>
> It reports bad hunks or lines not found for some reason. Is there any
> different syntax that I need to use for patch?
> I ended up doing it by hand and then untaring Thomas's tar file for
> the at91
> directory.
>
> Applied Tim Drury's at91.patch and it complains also line number and file
> names not found. I stopped here.
>
> Something is wrong. Does it matter what CVS version is used? Any tip
> based I
> what I said? Starting points?
>
> TNX
> Greg Holdren
>
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss