This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: c++ ecos performance
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 09:29:01AM -0600, Rosimildo da Silva wrote:
> From: "Grant Edwards" <grante@visi.com>
> To: "Mike Moran" <mnmoran@bellsouth.net>
> Cc: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] c++ ecos performance
>
>
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:45:55PM -0500, Mike Moran wrote:
> >
> > > > [I don't like C++ much as a language (in the abstract) as I
> > > > think it's too complex and too unsafe. But, I must say that
> > > > the guys who wrote eCos used it well.]
> > >
> > > Yikes! "Too complex"? "too unsafe"? Excuse me for reacting to this
> > > flame bait, but this is pure bunk,
> >
> > I don't like C++ from a language-design viewpoint. I think
> > that trying to retain backwards compatibility with C was a huge
> > mistake. I think it's too complex and too unsafe. Both of those
> > statements are 100% true.
> >
> > > and I get tired of this unjustified attitude. C++ provides many
> > > features as a means to solve various types of problems
> > > encountered in software engineering.
> >
> > This isn't really the right forum, but I think C++ provides too
> > many features and provides them in ways that are too easy to
> > misunderstand and unintentionally misuse. Something like
> > Modula-[23] or even Ada are, IMO, better designed languages if
> > you want a compiled, imperitive/procedural lanugage. Scheme,
> > Smalltalk, and Python are some others that I think are well
> > designed.
> >
> > > Best of all, if you don't want the feature, you don't have to
> > > use it.
>
> In my 15 years doing C++, the biggest problem all along is really
> the lack of understanding of OO principles.
>
> Most of the code that I've seen, written in C++ is "C" code written
> using a C++ compiler, and it uses classes as "namespaces".
>
> I dare to ask: what is "unsafe" in C++ that is not in C ?
Nothing. C is also unsafe. But, C is far simpler, so it's
easier to avoid the pitfalls.
--
Grant Edwards
grante@visi.com
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss