This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: On Interruptions
- From: Cristiano Ligieri Pereira <cpereira at ics dot uci dot edu>
- To: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:58:18 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] On Interruptions
I'm actually getting the counter value by means of a function. In any
case, never mind. I fixed the problem already.
thanks for the answers anyways,
Cristiano.
------------------------------------------------------------
Cristiano Ligieri Pereira - http://www.ics.uci.edu/~cpereira
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Cristiano Ligieri Pereira wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a interruption which increments a counter in a periodic basis. The
> > variable is also read by any of the threads to find out the counter value
> > at any given time.
> >
> > It turns out that the counter is being increased but when I read its value
> > from any of the threads I get a zero as the current value. The counter is
> > defined as a "volatile". Is there any other precaution that I should take
> > in order to get the right value?
>
> Declared as volatile in declaration as well as definition? Small code
> sample possibly?
>
> Jifl
> --
> Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
> Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine
>