This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE isnt exact.
- To: <ecos-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE isnt exact.
- From: "K. Young Park" <pkyoung at palmpalm dot co dot kr>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:02:10 +0900
I do not know about the MIPS atlas board, but I guess two flash memories are accessed by 32 it unit.
That is, one for D0~D15 and the other for D16~D31. So the block size should be 256k(0x40000) instead of 128K.
-----Original Message-----
From: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com [mailto:ecos-discuss-
owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of 이 성재
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:19 AM
To: ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: [ECOS] FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE isnt exact.
For example, MIPS Atlas board use strata flash memory. As you know strata
flash has 128kbyte block size that is 0x20000byte.
But, there (in ecos src) defined as 'FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE = 0x40000'. And this
define is used all over the platform that use strata flash.
I cannt understand this DEFINE.
So, the question is...
1. Why does ecos define FLASH_BLOCK_SIZE = 0x40000?
2. Can I modify this define 0x20000? Is there no ploblem(eg. block_number)?
Thank you.
P.S - My platform has two E28F640.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Explorer가 있으면 Hotmail 사용이 훨씬 편리해 집니다. 지금
http://explorer.msn.co.kr/ 에서 무료로 다운로드하세요.