Re: [docbook] proposed guidelines on DocBook RFE acceptance criteria

[Michael Smith <smith at xml-doc dot org>]

This looks perfect to me

  --Mike

Nancy P Harrison <nancyph@us.ibm.com> writes:

> The DocBook Technical Committee is soliciting feedback on a set of 
> proposed guidelines. The guidelines will explain how the TC decides which 
> Requests for Enhancement (RFEs) it will implement.
> 
> If you have comments on the guidelines statement proposed below, please 
> respond to this mail.
> 
> ================ Proposed Guidelines ==================================
> The DocBook Technical Committee, as part of its commitment to maintaining 
> DocBook, responds to Requests for Enhancement (RFEs) submitted by the 
> DocBook user community. The likelihood that a submitted RFE will be 
> implemented is determined by the degree to which it meets the following 
> criteria: 
> 
> a.  The change is within the scope of the TC's  charter  (see 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/docbook/charter.php) 
> b.  The change is consistent with the existing DocBook model.
> c.  The change is of general benefit to the community of users. The more 
> widely beneficial a requested change appears to be to the overall user 
> community, the more likely it is that the TC will implement is.
> ===================================================================
> 
> Thanks for giving us your feedback on this.
> 
> ____
> Nancy Harrison
> IBM Rational Software
> Phone: 781-676-2535
> nancyph@us.ibm.com
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature