This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>
- To: Jeff Biss <jeff at marco-inc dot com>
- Cc: David Cramer <dcramer at motive dot com>,docbook mailing list <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:39:06 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:
> So what are you proposing? That an inline procedure element be a child
> of the paragraph element?
only that a <para> be allowed to have a <procedure> as a child,
that's all. i think this has gotten blown way out of proportion
here.
rday