This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>
- To: Tim Waugh <twaugh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Biss <jeff at marco-inc dot com>, David Cramer <dcramer at motive dot com>,docbook mailing list <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:27:05 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Tim Waugh wrote:
> I think you're confusing <para> with <simpara>. A <para> is not a
> single textual paragraph, but a grouping of elements that constitute
> an idea. It's typically used in the same way that <simpara> is, but
> it's very often used like this:
>
> <para>It's very often used like this:
> <itemizedlist>...
yeah! what he said.
rday