This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
RE: simple ToC question
- From: David Cramer <dcramer at broadjump dot com>
- To: Dave Pawson <dpawson at nildram dot co dot uk>, Federico Sacerdoti <fds at sdsc dot edu>,docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 13:55:05 -0500
- Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: simple ToC question
Looks like they're using DSSSL:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE> NPACI Rocks User's Guide </TITLE>
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.64">
So they'll have to go here for their delicious reading:
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/dsssl/dsssl.html
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/dsssl/current/doc/html/r1081.htm
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/dsssl/current/doc/html/index.html (Or the corresponding place in their distribution for the 1.64 docs)
And that's the sum of what I know about DSSSL :-)
David
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dpawson@nildram.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:42 PM
> To: Federico Sacerdoti; docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: simple ToC question
>
>
> At 18:35 02/10/2002, Federico Sacerdoti wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >We here at SDSC love docbook as everyone does. I have a
> question about how we can make our HTML ToC look better.
> Currently, our Rocks cluster homepage,
> http://www.rocksclusters.org/, is very simple, and I feel
> hard to visually parse.
>
> Perspective?
>
> Its 'visually' well laid out, IMO numbers wouldn't help with that?
> If it were chapters or sections which actually numbered...
> but
>
> Installing a Rocks Cluster isn't section/chapter 2,
> so (very much my opinion) it's not needed?
>
> However :-)
>
> See http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/styling/params.html#d6e18
>
> or
>
> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/fo/chap
ter.autolabel.html
and lots of stuff more....
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/html/index.html
is the html version.
Makes delicious reading
(perhaps I shouldn't admit that :-)
regards DaveP