This is the mail archive of the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list for the DocBook project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re[2]: Which conversion method should I use?

From: Jose <studio at qadram dot com>
To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:31:13 +0200
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re[2]: Which conversion method should I use?
Organization: QaDRAM Software
References: <E97137CF9A25D311902E00A0C9F484E01219D8E5@xfc03.fc.hp.com><78105447235.20020618190149@qadram.com> <87u1nw8w7x.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Reply-to: Jose <studio at qadram dot com>

Hello Norman,

Friday, June 21, 2002, 5:53:06 PM, you wrote:

NW> |       I would prefer a Windows solution, but if I have no choice, I
NW> |       would use Linux.

NW> I think all of the possible tools can be made to work on Windows.

I'm using xsltproc and FOP to transform a DocBook document to PDF on
Windows, but I have some problems with <programlisting> because all
the source code is aligned to the right and some kind of justified.
Another member of this list pointed me to use PassiveTex, but I think
it's a Linux only solution, Can I run PassiveTex on Windows?, If so,
could you tell me how?. There's another FOP processor for Windows?

Best Regards.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which conversion method should I use?
  - From: Norman Walsh

References:
- RE: Attributes for text direction and language
  - From: HAMILTON,DICK (HP-FtCollins,ex1)
- Which conversion method should I use?
  - From: Jose

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]