This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: Literary DTDs
- To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Literary DTDs
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- Date: 02 Jul 2000 16:58:20 -0400
- References: <D165D895D883D211952100805F652173162598@sppe.com> <00062712220500.03119@needaguru>
- Reply-To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
/ madhu <b_maddy_016@yahoo.com> was heard to say:
| otherwise wont you be better off using standalone XML/XSL route
Never. Clearly this is nothing more than my humble opinion, but I make
DTDs (or schema) for every doctype I create or use, even if it
contains only two elements. How else can I ever hope to make sure that
I haven't made a mistake? Spelled an element incorrectly? Nested
something backwards? Left out a required element?
Without a DTD or schema to validate your instances, you have to look
at every page of output that every stylesheet you use produces. You
can never be sure that the stylesheet did the right thing because you
have unconstrained input.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A hen is only an egg's way of
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | making another egg.--Samuel Butler
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | (II)