This is the mail archive of the
docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the docbook-tools project.
Re: Re : db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else?
Jorge Godoy wrote:
> > - to have the db2* scripts change their status from "unmaintained"
> > to "maintained"
>
> It would be nice...
(I would be the maintainer of those db2* scripts, of course)
> > - to have better directory organization in /usr/lib/sgml
>
> It depends on your distribution. How's you /usr/lib/sgml? I've done a
> few customizations here... :-)
My distribution is the Caldera ;-). Here is /usr/lib/sgml organization
[eric@quark eric]$ ls /usr/lib/sgml
docbook-dtd
docbook-stylesheets
iso-entities-8879.1986
jade
kde
"iso-entities" directory name is the only one which does not match the
package name, to ensure compatibility with sgml-tools 1.0 linuxdoc
tools.
The DocBook tools hosted by Cygnus sourceware FTP server suggest a
different directory organisation, at least if you are using the RPM
version.
> > - to have things work better with alternate stylesheets
>
> I do it with a wrapper, a Makefile and standar tools: jade/openjade &
> norm's modular stylesheets.
Of course every one can build his own solution. At KDE we used a series
of symbolic links as patches to the Cygnus tools. What I'm suggesting is
a good common technical solution for everyone.
> > - to make as little assumptions as possible : no
> > "common" stylesheet for html and printout if not wished,
> > no need of merging the individual catalogs in a single CATALOG
> > if not wished, etc
>
> It's not difficult. That's one of the reasons I don't use Cygnus
> tools.
;-)
I didn't say I made something difficult. I said I wanted to share my
experience and to integrate it into the Cygnus docbook tools, with Mark
Galassi's approval and technical advice, of course.
> > - gnuish syntax
>
> Hmmm... It would require some programming, but... it's possible too.
It's not much again. You will be able to do things like db2html
--version, db2html --help, db2html --catalog somewhere.cat, etc
> > - compatibility (if no alternate stylesheets used) with
> > former docbook-tools
>
> What do you mean by "compatibility"? If your document is written in
> DocBook, it should be compatible with any tools used to process
> DocBook files.
I was referring to those famous db2* scripts, the ability to use the
CATALOG merged by "install-catalog" script, etc.
> > My distribution will be used by Caldera OpenLinux and KDE project. I'm
> > proposing to
> > make it the standard docbook-tools as well, if you agree. Just let me
> > know.
>
> If you need some help, just drop me a message.
Thanks, the more crazy cows we are, the funniest the meat will be ;-)
What I need now is some approval by docbook-tools maintainer, Mark
Galassi, and somewhere to build a docbook-utils homepage (docbook-utils
being the set of db2* scripts, plus the install-catalog script, which I
suggest to be separate from the modular stylesheets package now).
--
Eric Bischoff - Documentation and Localization
Caldera (Deutschland) GmbH - Linux for Business!
Tel: +49 9131 7192 300 - Fax: +49 9131 7192 399
http://www.caldera.de/