This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: [docbook-apps] Abbreviation or aliases
- From: "Chris Johnson" <cjohnson at capcollege dot bc dot ca>
- To: <davep at dpawson dot co dot uk>
- Cc: <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>,<smith at xml-doc dot org>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 10:39:20 -0700
- Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Abbreviation or aliases
Hi Dave,
I'm all for the 'lazy' method... ;>
I'll give it a go and see how this approach affects processing time.
Thanks again,
Chris
Chris Johnson
Web Developer
Capilano College
North Vancouver, Canada
604.986.1911 ext. 3455
cjohnson@capcollege.bc.ca
>>> Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> 06/05/2005 10:20:47 am >>>
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 09:56 -0700, Chris Johnson wrote:
> Mike, Dave,
>
> This seems like a sensible way to go, but what if you have more than
> 200 or so entities? I'm working on a document that uses at least
this
> many, and they are re-generated from a database extract (along with
the
> entity driver files)... I have been happy with this approach to date
but
> now I'm working in a .NET environment, and I'll have to move from DTD
to
> schema and/or schema + internal DTD subset...
>
> Any other thoughts on this?
I manually generated the entity name and its text equivalent.
With 200, and being lazy, I would get the computer to help me
(I'm sure Michael would too!)
Use the same approach, just generate the entity definitions
or xslt processing for Michaels solution, by a program.
The idea is still good
HTH DaveP
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org