This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
RE: [docbook-apps] Recusive <section/>'s and their conclusions
- From: "Ruiter, Epco de (RBI-NL)" <Epco dot de dot Ruiter at reedbusiness dot nl>
- To: "'Dimitry V. Ketov'" <Dimitry dot Ketov at avalon dot ru>, docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:32:10 +0100
- Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Recusive <section/>'s and their conclusions
You can easily use the same trick I've used to have an image for Tip with
hiding the Tip-title:
.tip { BACKGROUND: url(stdimg/components/tip.gif) no-repeat 5pt
12pt;
PADDING: 5px 5px 5px 100px; }
DIV.tip H3 { display: none }
Apart from that it's more correct (think semantics) to let the conclusion be
a section (with a title).
Keep in mind to keep layout and content apart (not always easy, some looks
can't be done without putting layout-code in DocBook-XML (for example
tables).
Epco
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimitry V. Ketov [mailto:Dimitry.Ketov@avalon.ru]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 5:28 PM
> To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Recusive <section/>'s and their
> conclusions
>
>
> It will be autogenerated by stylesheets, e.g. fixed
> "Conclusion" title, without any
> content-driven <title>'s text.
>
> David Tolpin ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> >
> >> <section>
> >> <title/>
> >> </section>
> >>
> >> <para>CONCLUSION</para>
> >>
> >> </article>
> >>
> >> but due to current DTD restrictions i'm not able to do that.
> >> I DON'T want to use another section for CONCLUSION, cause
> it haven't
> >> got title that is mandatory for the section.
> >>
> >> What am i doing wrong? Is there any ways to solve this task?
> >
> > How will the reader know that the last section is over and
> he is into
> > the conclusion, if it does not have a title?
>