This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: [docbook-apps] chunking question
- From: "Bob Stayton" <bobs at sagehill dot net>
- To: "Patrick Eisenacher" <docbook-apps at mailshelter dot de>, "Docbook-Apps" <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:42:35 -0800
- Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] chunking question
- References: <418B39E9.3050400@mailshelter.de>
Hi Patrick,
I'm not able to duplicate this problem with the stock 1.66.1 html/chunk.xsl
stylesheet and xsltproc. The sect2s in my article/appendix come out as part
of the sect1 chunks. Can you send me a short test file that illustrates the
problem?
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
bobs@sagehill.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Eisenacher" <docbook-apps@mailshelter.de>
To: "Docbook-Apps" <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 12:29 AM
Subject: [docbook-apps] chunking question
> Greetings everybody,
>
> how can I synch the chunking behaviour between the sections in the main
> part of my article and the sections in its appendix? Currently I get the
> sect2s of the sect1s of the main part in one chunk, whereas I get the
> sect2s of the sect1s of the appendix in separate chunks.
>
> This is using the standard XSL stylesheets v1.66.1 along with
> $ xsltproc -V
> Using libxml 20613, libxslt 10110-CVS940 and libexslt 808-CVS940
> xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20613, libxslt 10110 and libexslt 808
> libxslt 10110 was compiled against libxml 20613
> libexslt 808 was compiled against libxml 20613
>
> Going a step further and adding my customization layer, I encountered
> the following further problems while trying to solve my problem:
>
> - chunk.tocs.and.lots generated toc chunk (ar01-toc.html) doesn't match
> the linkends (index.html-toc.html) in the other generated chunks, when
> use.id.as.filename is set
>
> - no toc is generated for sections, even though I set
> <xsl:param name="generate.toc">
> appendix toc
> article toc,title
> section toc
> </xsl:param>
> but perhaps this is related to the problem mentioned above.
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Patrick
>
>