Re: sqlite3-3.7.15.1-1 packages to test

[Warren Young <warren at etr-usa dot com>]

On 2/6/2013 15:44, David Stacey wrote:
> I've run four sets of tests, with sqlite3 3.7.13 and
> 3.7.15, both with and without Warren's patch. The bottom line is that
> Subversion appears to function identically in all four cases, and there
> was no significant difference in runtime performance (i.e. the time
> taken to run the tests).

I'm inferring from "four tests" that this result is for the fsfs case 
only, and that bdb is still assumed to have a problem.

Since this report of yours on Jan 9, I've been meaning to try and set up 
the famous SQLite test suite on a Cygwin box and set it to grinding, to 
exonerate the new .15.1 builds.  But if we think it now doesn't matter...

> I can supply more details if you need them, but essentially Subversion
> appears to function happily with sqlite3 3.7.13 or 3.7.15, both with or
> without the patch.

.15.2 is out, so do you want me to build a new set of packages for you 
to test and potentially GTG?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple