Re: [SOLVED] Re: What updates done after October 3 may affect gfortran built binaries?

[Ryan Johnson <ryan dot johnson at cs dot utoronto dot ca>]

On 15/11/2011 10:53 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 09/11/2011 12:15, Edvardsen KÃre wrote:
> > This is again related to the failure of execution of a gfortran built
> > binary ("cannot execute binary", see thread
> > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-11/msg00034.html )
> >
> > In short, the main problem is that I can't build a successful binary
> > from the FLEXPART fortran code
>
>    I helped Edvardsen to track this down off-list.  It turns out that FLEXPART
> is one of those huge number-crunching Fortran programs that's just jam-packed
> with ginormous multi-dimensional arrays.  The final linked executable had 3.38
> GB of .bss space!  So, it's not too surprising that it didn't load on 32-bit
> Windows; and it's not, as I was worrying, any explicit bug in the compiler or
> binutils (although it may be arguable that ld could be helpful if it issued
> some kind of warning in these circumstances).
Out of curiosity, how then was the OP ever able to make *any* version run?

Ryan


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple